Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Billions Wasted on UN Carbon Offsets programs--Stanford experts

Guardian UK, 5/26/08: "Billions of pounds are being wasted in paying industries in developing countries to reduce climate change emissions, according to two analyses of the UN's carbon offsetting programme.

Leading academics and watchdog groups allege that the UN's main offset fund is being routinely abused by

  • chemical, wind, gas and hydro companies who are claiming emission reduction credits for
  • projects that should not qualify.

The result is that no genuine pollution cuts are being made,

  • undermining assurances by the UK government and others that carbon markets are dramatically reducing greenhouse gases, the researchers say.

The criticism centres on the UN's clean development mechanism (CDM),

  • an international system established by the Kyoto process that allows "rich countries"* to meet emissions targets by
  • funding clean energy projects in developing nations.

Credits from the project are being bought by European companies and governments who are unable to meet their carbon reduction targets.

  • The market for CDM credits is growing fast.

At present it is worth nearly $20bn a year, but this is expected to grow to over $100bn within four years.

A working paper from two senior Stanford University academics examined more than 3,000 projects applying for or already granted up to $10bn of credits from the UN's CDM funds over the next four years,

"They would be built anyway," says David Victor, law professor at the Californian university. "It looks like between one and

Governments consider that CDM is vital to reducing global emissions under the terms of the Kyoto treaty."

  • (WHY NOT? THE US GOVERNMENT simply ROBS ITS OWN TAXPAYERS TO THROW CASH INTO SLUSH FUNDS OF THE GLOBAL MAFIA). ed.

(Guardian, continuing): "To earn credits under the mechanism, emission reductions must be in addition to those that would have taken place without the project. But critics argue

The Stanford paper, by Victor and his colleague Michael Wara, found that nearly every new hydro, wind and natural gas-fired plant expected to be

  • built in China in the next four years is applying for CDM credits,
  • even though it is Chinese policy to encourage these industries.

"Traders are finding ways of gaining credits that they would never have had before. You will never know accurately,

A separate study published this week by US watchdog group International Rivers argues that nearly three quarters of all registered CDM projects were complete at the time of approval, suggesting that CDM money was not needed to finance them.

"It would seem clear that a project that is already built cannot need extra income in order to be built," said Patrick McCully, director of the thinktank in California. "Judging additionality has turned out to be unknowable and unworkable.

by John Vidal, "Billions Wasted on UN Climate Programme"


Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Soros-like web of Acorn wealth in NY city

9/21/09: "Acorn has quietly become one of the Big Apple's biggest owners of low- and moderate-income housing, amassing a real estate empire

New York ACORN and a tangled web of affiliates own or manage nearly 1,500 housing units across three boroughs and draw in an estimated $5.7 million in rents, fees and profits from sales.

Many have generic names, like the 385 Palmetto Street Housing Development Fund or the Mutual Housing Association of New York, leaving

"Nut-House Empire," by Brendan Scott, NY Post, via Free Republic

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Democrats thought opponent would be Republicans. Wrong. It turned out to be the People.

  • It certainly isn't "the Republicans."
"Obama is falling and contrary to what anyone might have expected, it was not the marginalized Republican party
  • under the inept leadership of Michael Steele or its stable of Congressional Republicans
  • providing nothing but token opposition, who gave him that big push.
While the official Republican leadership sat in the corner,
  • information flew back and forth between bloggers, activists and talk show hosts and the result was an authentic grass roots movement.

“The Mobs” that panicked Democratic politicians and their media press corps decry represent the one thing that a phony grass roots movement like the Obama campaign fear the most… being confronted with an authentic grass roots movement. Their campaigns against radio and TV hosts like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck reveal that

  • they cannot understand
  • what is going on
  • as anything but some top down operation.

After all they are supposed to represent “The People”,

but the only people they could find to represent them at the Town Halls were

  • the SEIU goons they packed the halls with. And there’s nothing like a “grass roots movement” that you have to bus in, which consists purely of people who are set to profit from your legislation.
The Republican leadership is almost as nervous, torn between seizing the moment or standing aside
  • to avoid being accused of “extremism”.
The same folks who thought the best way to run a Presidential campaign was by
and that public opinion is determined by the op ed page of the New York Times and the Washington Post, naturally have no clue how to respond to the situation.
  • The Republican leadership has become detached from its base and increasingly has no idea how to connect to the concerns of ordinary Americans.
By stepping back from the fight,

But as appealing as populist rhetoric about fiscal conservatism may be, the whole power of being a congressman rests in handing out pork.

  • Even Ron Paul who tried to brand himself as a leader in fiscal conservatism turned out to have his share of earmarks and family members on the payroll.

And that unfortunately is the default standard for politicians, and though some may hide it better than others, a politician is a man who works on your payroll to spend your money on behalf of his supporters, which is why expecting fiscal conservatism from congress is like expecting a lion to go vegetarian.

Politicians listen to their constituents when they say they want lower taxes, less regulation, less immigration and no NAFTA. Sometimes they even mimic the rhetoric or even get out front to lead the parade, but when they’re in the Senate cloakroom, it quickly becomes a whole different ballgame. But politicians can’t do anything except on behalf of the people—and rarely has there been such a showing of the people coming out to denounce a policy supposedly being enacted on their behalf.

  • The Town Hall protests tore away the philanthropic facade behind ObamaCare.
  • It was not some imaginary wealthy “Brooks Brothers Brigade” that went into the Town Halls,

but ordinary working class Americans who firmly and vocally said, “No Thanks” to the ObamaCare boondoggle. And that has become a major gamechanger.

  • Obama and his cronies were counting on fighting the Republican party.

They were counting on taking swipes at Limbaugh or Beck. They were not counting on serious public opposition. Denouncing the health care protesters as right wing extremists did not help. Trying to claim that the Obama socialist photoshop was racist was a desperate move that jumped the race card shark. By their very presence, the protests made ObamaCare controversial, and simply denouncing them was not going to be able to reverse that.

  • The more the media denounced them and the more SEIU thugs attacked them; the more the general public came to see ObamaCare as a controversial program.

While the Republican party may have been neutered for now, Obama finds himself in the very uncomfortable position of playing, “Obama vs the People”. The Obama Administration was counting on being able to run up the tab by the trillions with no serious congressional opposition. But while that worked long enough to subsidize UAW auto companies and bailout Obama’s Wall Street buddies, after two thirds of a year in which the economic situation kept sliding downward, the American people began grumbling about his lack of results.

Like most politicians, Obama did not understand that the voters did not put him into office so that he could run up a deficit of trillions of dollars composed of pork, giveaways

  • and senseless centralization.

Obama ran for office promising hope and change. The only things he delivered were payoffs to Wall Street donors and UAW union featherbedders. And just as he was about to deliver a whopping payoff to his SEIU union Marxist buddies, the whole thing collapsed because the American people reached the point where they had enough....

  • The State Senate assigned him credit for other people’s legislation. In the United States Senate, he ran for higher office after only a 100 days in the chamber.

Like a precocious third grader who suddenly finds himself in college, Obama had no idea how to work with congress to get legislation passed.

  • And the same media which sneered at McCain’s claims that he had the experience that Obama didn’t, was now forced to admit that the lack of focus and credibility at the White House level was a serious problem.

While Obama was still coasting on his “historic election”, a lot of congressmen were getting ready for their nerve-racking midterm elections. The Republicans were still shellshocked, and liberal Democrats were arrogant, but the conservative Democrats who had given their party the majority in 06 and 08, felt vulnerable. Cut out of the loop by an increasingly radicalized White House and congressional leadership, and threatened by midterm elections that traditionally cut down seats belonging to the ruling party, they became the legislative weak point in ObamaCare. And once the Town Hall protests made it safer to do nothing, than to do something, ObamaCare hit an invisible brick wall.

  • Using the media, Obama squashed most opposition by established politicians,

but he has now come face to face with a vocal popular revolt at the Town Hall protests and a quieter but vaster sense of dissatisfaction by the American electorate. Republican and Independent approval is peeling away, followed by that of many Democrats, leaving the naked emperor cloaked only in his own base and without a national mandate for change. And even his own supporters are beginning to suspect that

  • Obama may have nothing more to offer beyond magazine covers and high minded rhetoric.

The White House has tried to fight back by targeting first Limbaugh and then Beck, demonstrating a profound contempt for the views of the grass roots opposition, which they imagine will go away if a few talk show hosts will just stop “inciting it.”

  • But what the left fails to understand is that if Limbaugh and Beck went off the air tomorrow, the situation would not change in any significant way.

Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck are not some sort of aberrant phenomenon,

And those views and concerns are not going away.

  • The battle is a battle of ideas,

and while the Democrats occupy the executive and legislative castles, they are finding that those positions may give them power, but also invest them with responsibilities in the middle of a crisis that they are simply not capable of living up to.

Throughout it all Obama has relied on his media manufactured charisma to shield a multitude of sins. But incompetence is one sin that cannot be covered by magazine covers. In the Senate, Obama could have gotten by easily enough. As a Vice President, he could have posed endlessly for magazine covers while accomplishing nothing. But in the Oval Office, he had to deliver, and the only thing he delivered was the hijacking of America at the hands of his radical legion of czars. Now is the moment of truth where Obama faces the people, and begins to deal with the consequences of the disaster he has created, the deficit, the lost jobs and the economic crisis he tried to exploit for political gain. The case of Obama vs the People has just begun." Canada Free Press, "Obama vs the People," by Daniel Greenfield, 9/7/09, via Lucianne.com